When has the first appearance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the court occurred? It may not be when you think, but let's start by going through the history we know in the news. The integration of AI into the legal system has been a topic of increasing interest and debate. The use of AI in court proceedings has been explored globally, with judiciaries, prosecution services, and other judicial bodies investigating its potential benefits and pitfalls.
AI has proven to be an invaluable ally throughout this process, facilitating significant progress
As early as January 2023, an AI lawyer made headlines as the first AI to defend a case in court. This AI, dubbed the world’s first “robot lawyer,” was set to generate legally sound arguments by finding loopholes in the law. However, professional lawyers shut down the initiative, highlighting the ongoing tension between traditional legal practice and AI-driven innovation.
In the same year, a startup called DoNotPay planned to use AI to help fight a traffic ticket, marking another significant milestone in the history of AI in court proceedings. Despite the controversy and the eventual shutdown of the initiative, it underscored the potential of AI in providing accessible legal assistance. However, it also served as a stark reminder of the legal profession’s resistance to such technological advancements.
Fast forward to a few months later, in a groundbreaking move, a judge used an AI text generator’s answers in a legal ruling, marking the first time a court admitted to using AI in such a manner. This event sparked a wave of discussions about the role of AI in judicial decision-making and the ethical implications of its use.
This brings us to the recent incident involving two lawyers from the East Coast who found themselves in hot water due to their use of AI, specifically ChatGPT, in court proceedings. The attorneys, Steven Schwartz of Manhattan’s Levidow, Levidow & Oberman law firm, and his colleague, used ChatGPT to aid in their legal research. However, the AI platform ended up generating several fictitious cases which were then cited in their federal court filings. This mishap has led to a potential sanctions hearing and a stern reminder of the importance of verifying the accuracy of AI-generated content.
Since December 2022, AI has played a significant role in court proceedings.
With this backdrop, let’s delve further into the role of AI in the U.S. court system. Since December 2022, AI has played a significant role in court proceedings. Personally, due to conflicts of interest encountered when contacting over 80 law firms in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, I have been compelled to represent myself (pro se) in order to prevent the foreclosure of my home. To navigate this situation and help me write my filings, I have relied on ChatGPT and other Language and Learning Models (LLMs).
The bank’s foreclosure proceedings serve as a smokescreen to conceal the extensive fraud I uncovered, originating from the 2008 financial crisis. This fraud mirrors the notorious Wells Fargo scandal of opening unauthorized customer accounts, but unlike Wells Fargo’s massive fraudulent activities to bolster earnings, BoA was using home loans. Importantly, it has been forensically established that the bank forged my signature on the deed of trust (which differs from my authentic handwriting noticeably). I didn’t know about the new paperwork nor had any apparent reason to want to, at a loss, redo my deed of trust only a year after getting my house. This compelling evidence strengthens the case of major fraud, warranting legal intervention. I truly need the government to help here, but so far, no one seems to care, which is disheartening.
Despite possessing substantial evidence to pursue a civil RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) suit against Bank of America, it is evident that the severity of this matter necessitates criminal RICO charges to be filed by the government. The intricate network implicated in this scheme operates at a local level, with the “robo” component being just a small part of the broader picture. The deadline to re-file my case approaches rapidly, emphasizing the urgent need for legal support as I navigate the nuances of the court system. I only have till the 22nd of this month(of June, so next week).
AI has proven to be an invaluable ally throughout this process, facilitating significant progress. However, even as a pro se litigant, I have remained diligent in verifying sources and consulting relevant case law. The potential for AI to aid those who have been victimized by the systemic advantages enjoyed by the wealthy is truly transformative.
It was discovered that law firms have been hindered by conflicts of interest, as they prioritize securing contracts from lenders, resulting in the neglect of foreclosure cases, even in instances involving fraudulent activities.
Interestingly, my quest for legal representation uncovered an astonishing revelation. It was discovered that law firms have been hindered by conflicts of interest, as they prioritize securing contracts from lenders, resulting in the neglect of foreclosure cases, even in instances involving fraudulent activities. This revelation was shared by an unexpected and unknowing informant who had insight into the manipulation at play and failed to not spill the beans. Remarkably, this individual possessed knowledge of my unemployment status, information known exclusively by the opposing party, further corroborating the claims of a RICO violation. I express my gratitude to this unintended informant for her role in exposing the scheme.
Additionally, I have faced threats from the opposing party aimed at deterring me from pursuing the case by labeling me a vexatious litigant. Their strategy involves exploiting procedural tactics to prolong the proceedings rather than facing a straightforward hearing where the lack of evidence would be exposed. I intend to publish an article shedding light on these experiences soon.
Furthermore, I am advocating for a groundbreaking approach known as Crowd Sourced Litigation, which enables individuals in desperate need of legal representation to receive assistance in an open-source manner.
If you are interested in joining the fight against fraudulent practices within the banking industry, which has the potential to catalyze positive change in the U.S. legal landscape, I encourage you to explore my TikTok or Twitter profiles for more information. Furthermore, you can access the filings related to my case in my repository at https://github.com/quantumJLBass/boa-fraud. Please note that the filings may not yet have a quick link in the welcome page but may be located within the folder under /case/plaintiff/docs as I continue to organize the repository.
For anyone that knows a lawyer that is of good moral fiber or is one, I thank you for your attention and consideration. Your expertise and support are crucial in ensuring a fair and just resolution to this transformative case. I eagerly await any further contributions and remain available to provide any necessary additional information.
